Using dogs to find cats: detection dogs as a survey method for wide-ranging cheetah

Monitoring cheetahs across large landscapes is challenging and time consuming for conservationists. ZSL’s Dr. Sarah Durant explores whether the answer to finding cheetahs lies with with another animal: dogs.

© Dave Hamman. The author with detection dog, Pepin

I don’t know at what point it dawned on me that, of all the crazy things wildlife ecologists might get up to, this ranked as one of the most ridiculous. Was it during my discussions with a local airline asking them if they could fly freshly collected cheetah poop cross-country? Was it when we were forced to squeeze three large four wheel drive vehicles onto a tiny barge to cross the Zambezi, a large and potentially crocodile inhabited river? Or was it, for reasons that will become clear below, when we staked out dog poop and watched, despondently, as it was rapidly ferried away by a spectacular diversity of dung beetles?

How did I end up in Liuwa Plain National Park in a remote corner of western Zambia, with Matt Becker, the Director of the Zambian Carnivore Programme (ZCP), Working Dogs for Conservation (WDC), Green Dogs and the Zambia Department of National Parks and Wildlife (formerly ZAWA), walking dogs and looking for cheetah scat?


First, some background on cheetahs…

Cheetahs are Africa’s rarest big cat. Only an estimated 7,000 individuals are thought to survive in the wild. They’re spread across 32 populations covering a vast area of more than 3 million square kilometres. Cheetah densities are never higher than two or three cheetahs per 100 square kilometres and can be as low as one cheetah per 4,000 square kilometres. Lion densities can be up to about 16.85 lions per 100 square kilometres. What’s more, in areas where cheetahs are persecuted, due to conflict with livestock and game keepers, they may flee before you are ever likely to even see them.

Cheetahs’ rarity and elusiveness poses a problem for conservationists. To conserve the species, we need to know where they still persist, and whether their numbers are increasing or decreasing. But how can we quickly and cheaply estimate their abundance?

© Jassiel M’soka. One of the estimated 17-19 cheetahs in Liuwa Plains National Park

Over more than two decades of studying and conserving cheetahs, I have tried many ways of counting them. I have tried simply looking for cheetahs and individually identifying them. This works well. But it requires cheetahs that don’t flee from vehicles, an open habitat – and a lot of time and patience. In short, this approach only works on the Serengeti plains and has been key to our long-term Serengeti Cheetah Project which has gathered information on individually known cheetahs for decades.

I have tried counting spoor – cheetah footprints left in the dust of dirt roads. Even in the Serengeti, where cheetah densities are at their highest, I had to drive an average of 50 km to find just a single spoor. At least 30 such observations are needed for a reliable density estimate.

Remote camera traps can also work in some circumstances and citizen science in tourist areas. But none of these methods work across different habitats, and all need substantial infrastructure and considerable investment in time.

Could the answer to finding cheetahs lie with another animal? Dogs have some of the world’s most sensitive snouts. We put these to the test in a remote corner of Zambia.


The importance of poop

One of the things dogs can sniff out very successfully – as any canine’s owner will know – is poop.

But poop has important properties beside smell. Food, as it passes through the digestive tract and rectum, accumulates DNA from the intestinal and rectal walls, which becomes embedded within the poop. This DNA is a unique genetic signature of individuals. Therefore if you can find cheetah scat, you can extract DNA and identify the genotype of that individual.

Cheetahs defecate at least once a day, hence cheetah scats should occur across the landscape more frequently than the cheetahs themselves. It follows that, if you can find enough scats and extract DNA from them, you may be able to estimate the numbers of individual cheetahs in the population. Finding scats, rather than cheetahs, has the added advantage in that scats don’t run away.

So far, so good. But there is a flaw in this plan. Cheetahs, who are largely non-territorial, don’t defecate in nice, easy to find, prominent locations. As a result, their scats are extremely difficult to detect.


Harnessing the power of the canine snout

This is where the poop-detecting power of the canine snout comes into play. Domestic dogs are increasingly playing an important role in conservation. Organisations such as Working Dogs for Conservation, and Green Dogs specialise in training domestic dogs for conservation work. They harness the dogs’ natural poop detection ability, by training them to find poop of a particular species, signal their trainer when they have found it, and, above all, resist the temptation to eat any poop they find.

Could domestic dogs be the key to counting cheetahs? Together with my colleagues from the Zambian Carnivore Programme and the Zambia Department of National Parks and Wildlife, we teamed up with Working Dogs for Conservation and Green Dogs to put domestic dogs to the test. This is what brought a team of large carnivore conservationists, two dogs (Faust and Pepin) and their trainers to a remote corner of western Zambia, where a low density, but unknown, population of cheetahs still survives in and around the Liuwa Plain National Park.

P1010392 cropped
© Sarah Durant. Pepin searching for cheetah scat with his trainer, Megan Parker from Working Dogs for Conservation


Disappearing poop

At first, the dogs struggled to find scats along our pre-designated dog walking transects. This was when we started to notice the conspicuous absence of the dogs’ poop around our camp. On closer inspection, we were alarmed to discover that, no sooner had a new deposition of poop been made, a small army of dung beetles appeared and started rolling it away in large bundles.

A large healthy pile of steaming dog poop could disappear completely in a matter of hours. Having been an observer of cheetah poop in the Serengeti over many years, this was a first for me, and it caused me a substantial amount of anxiety.

Fortunately, as the dogs moved south, they started to find cheetah scat laden with bone and hair. This, presumably, was much less appealing to a passing dung beetle.

In fact, the dogs turned out to be very successful at finding cheetah scats. In all, they found 27 scats over a survey area of 2,400 square kilometres. Humans, on similar transects looking for spoor, found none. This neatly demonstrated the superiority of the canine snout over the human eye when it came to detecting the presence of cheetahs.


Estimating population size

These scats were combined with a number of opportunistically collected scats. The DNA extracted from the scat samples were of poor quality, and so interpreting the genotypes wasn’t always easy.

However, we were able to generate an estimate of between 17-19 cheetah in the area, with a density of 6-7 individuals per 1000 square kilometres. The preliminary estimate of genetic effective population size was low, at just 8-14 individuals, and requires further investigation.

Many areas where cheetahs still survive are remote and difficult to access. Prior to this study, there were no viable methods for obtaining reliable information on cheetah abundance in most of these areas. The beauty of using detection dogs was that surveys could be conducted on foot, and the whole survey took not much more than three weeks, although genetic work could take substantially more time.

Our study, therefore, provides an important step forward in our ability to detect cheetahs across large landscapes, monitor them and assess population trends. Such information is critical for mobilising conservation action and resources to halt the global decline of this elusive and secretive big cat.

Sarah Durant


This blog was adapted from a version that appeared in ‘The Conversation, Africa’. 

The Conversation logo

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: